Is Roberto Bolaño The Next Literary Fraud?

The New York Times reported on Thursday that Bolaño’s widow, Carolina López, is challenging the author’s self-constructed image as a literary outlaw. It seems that he was not in Chile at the time that General Augusto Pinochet was toppled, and he did not have the appitite for heroin that has been reported.
On one hand, I feel that there is nothing to see here. That Bolaño had manufactured a mythology around himself is nothing new for authors. Furthermore, while it enhanced his reputation, said reputation was not dependent on that myth. He was not selling his life story for twenty-five bucks a copy the way James Frey was.
On the other, I would hate to think that his publishers, translators and literary executors would seek to knowingly profit from manipulating his posthumous fame. The last thing we need is another junkie to romanticize.
What’s the old saying about if choosing between facts and the myth, to print the myth?
I don’t think this is going to be the end of the world. As the article mentions, Bolaño’s narratives are filled with literary detective work, and it seems that if any misinformation about him is going to be perpetuated, it will be done so by the legion of readers who lionize him, but are unable to do a tremendous amount of research due to the language barrier. If all you’re relying on is his Wiki page, then you’re probably going to get a lot of his life story wrong.
(Bolaño photo courtesy of New Directions)
- Leave a comment... Comments Off



